Sahara Fragile

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States

Sahara Fragile

Header Banner

Sahara Fragile

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States
Fragile States
Home›Fragile States›Beware of Claims of Financial Inclusion Amid Cryptocurrency

Beware of Claims of Financial Inclusion Amid Cryptocurrency

By Christopher J. Jones
May 16, 2022
0
0

In theory, this pilot looks promising. What’s better than free cash, goods and services in a cash-strapped town? However, closer examination raises serious concerns about the risks asked of low-income Chicagoans.

The mayor and her team shouldn’t promote cryptocurrencies for their “financial inclusion” benefits, when these claims lack evidence and the crypto space remains unregulated and without consumer protections. For example, cryptocurrencies do not currently meet the needs of unbanked, underbanked, or low-income Chicagoans who lack access to simple, fast, and affordable financial services. Cryptocurrency transaction processing can be slow and crypto networks often come with even higher transaction fees than traditional financial institutions. Cryptocurrencies are also notoriously volatile, making them unsuitable for day-to-day transactions and payments. And crypto products and platforms are rages with scams, cheats and hacks.

In addition, the products and services offered in the pilot raise important questions. For example, will participants receive the monthly $500 in cash or will they have to accept cryptocurrencies? Will they be required to use a crypto wallet or another company investment product? Can participants just take the money and not use the products? If FTX products are needed, which should raise alarm bells, what recourse do participants have if these products are hacked? Finally, how will the city ensure this isn’t just a gimmick to lure low-income Chicagoans into a risky market?

FTX US President Brett Harrison tweeted that “FTX and the FTX Foundation aim to make long-term investments in the communities of which we are a part and to use cryptography and our fintech stack to provide new means of equitable access to financial services to historically underserved populations . Harrison is right to recognize communities that have historically been denied access to mainstream financial services – a particularly acute problem. in Chicago. Yet, while “equitable access” is a lofty goal, are volatile and risky cryptocurrencies the solution? We must ask ourselves if this access has a cost and, above all, if this “inclusion” can become predatory for the most vulnerable.

Indeed, the concept of “predatory inclusion” has been extensively studied by researchers such as Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, Louise Couture, Raphaël Charron-Chénier and Tressie McMillan Cottom. The concept refers to marginalized groups accessing goods, services or opportunities from which they were previously excluded, but the conditions that accompany this access undermine or eliminate the long-term benefits, while others benefit from this inclusion. An example of predatory inclusion can be for-profit colleges, which aim to expand access to higher education, but have higher cost and difficult to repay student loans. There is also payday loans, which provide access to credit but entail high costs and risks. Similarly, crypto can offer access to alternative financial services, but with the caveats of high risk and insufficient consumer protections.

Making Chicago a hub of an emerging industry and attracting new business makes sense, especially if it’s done through partnerships, cross-industry collaborations, and community involvement. Moreover, the goal of making the FTX US pilot a complement to the city’s other two Guaranteed Basic Income initiatives may have been well-intentioned. These initiatives have been championed and won by activists and advocates, and city officials should be proud to lead an innovative anti-poverty agenda. Yet there was no need to confuse these initiatives with risky products and services.

At this stage of technology development, promoting crypto as a form of financial inclusion is irresponsible. It might be wiser for city officials to wait and see if crypto technology rises or falls first. In the meantime, the people of Chicago would be best served by officials who work to address the root causes of discriminatory financial services in the first place.

Tonantzin Carmona is a David M. Rubenstein Fellow at Brookings Subway.

Related posts:

  1. Why would anyone want to get out of debt?
  2. When and how each Lancashire council will pay residents the £150 council tax rebate
  3. More and more businesses in Michigan are going cashless. But customers who only accept cash need not worry.
  4. The Arrogance of the Rhode Island Payday Loan Industry

CATEGORIES

  • Fragile States
  • Kalahari desert
  • Namib desert
  • Sahara desert
  • Savanna desert

RECENT POSTS

  • NEW POLL SHOWS SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF HOURLY WORKERS FIGHTING HIGH GASOLINE PRICES AND INFLATION
  • Obituary of Richard Gauthier – Le Soleil du Désert
  • Three tips for investing in a recession
  • Norwich’s Joe Ringer Band flew to the Sahara Desert
  • Amber Heard will become a “full-time mom” in this remote desert town

ARCHIVES

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • November 2012
  • May 2012
  • October 2011
  • November 2010
  • April 2008
  • July 2006
  • November 2005
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions