Sahara Fragile

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States

Sahara Fragile

Header Banner

Sahara Fragile

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States
Fragile States
Home›Fragile States›Lawmakers give final approval to loan interest rate bill

Lawmakers give final approval to loan interest rate bill

By Christopher J. Jones
February 16, 2022
0
0
John Nye, the owner of Money Now installment loans in El Prado, testifies against a bill to lower New Mexico’s annual interest rate cap on storefront loans during a Tuesday Judiciary Committee hearing of the Senate. The bill received final legislative approval on Wednesday and will now pass through the office of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. (Eddie Moore/Diary)

SANTA FE – A bill reducing New Mexico’s annual interest rate cap on storefront loans – from 175% to 36% – received final approval Wednesday at the State House, marking the apparent end of a murderous debate of several years.

Final approval came after Rep. Susan Herrera, D-Embudo, urged the House to accept Senate amendments to the bill.

The other chamber, she said, had removed a provision imposing new reporting requirements on credit unions – a move she said made sense because reporting would not provide meaningful data.

Additionally, the legislation, House Bill 132, has been revised to push back its effective date – from July to January 2023.

While critics have argued that lowering the state’s annual interest rate cap on small loans would lead to job losses and could make it harder for New Mexicans to access credit, lenders said the lenders were intentionally targeting low-income state residents.

Specifically, 65% of current lenders in New Mexico are located within 15 miles of tribal lands, according to the New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty.

“No one should be allowed to charge triple-digit interest rates,” said Ona Porter of Prosperity Works, one of the groups pushing for change. “No one should have to choose between paying their rent and making payments on a three-figure loan that often holds them back indefinitely.

Opponents of the bill countered that its enactment would force many of New Mexico’s roughly 400,000 consumers who use alternative financial services to seek other sources of money.

“Unfortunately, today marks a shift in the wrong direction for New Mexico consumers, especially the many New Mexico consumers who use alternative financial services to make ends meet,” said Andrew Duke, executive director. from the Virginia-based Online Lenders Alliance.

A similar proposal fell through last year’s 60-day legislative session amid a deadlock between the House and Senate, but this year’s proposal passed both legislative houses with bipartisan support.

It passed the House on a 51-18 vote and cleared the Senate Tuesday night via a 19-8 vote.

Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham signaled her support for the measure shortly after Wednesday’s vote in the House to pass the bill’s changes. The Democratic governor has until March 9 to sign or veto the measure.

“This legislation addresses an important issue that affects the most vulnerable New Mexicans in rural and urban communities, which is why I have included such action in my legislative priorities for 2021,” said Lujan Grisham. “I am pleased to see the Legislature reach consensus on the measure and applaud the members for voting to protect New Mexico consumers.”

New Mexico has a long history of regulating the lending industry.

A previous 36% cap on loan interest rates was abolished by the Legislature in the 1980s amid high inflation, according to research by Santa Fe-based Think New Mexico, which has is pushing for the lower rate cap to be reinstated.

After years of Roundhouse debate, lawmakers passed a 2017 bill that established the current 175% interest rate cap on small loans and banned so-called payday loans with terms of less than 120 days.

But some lawmakers and advocacy groups have insisted the 175% cap is too high and frequently leaves New Mexicans stuck in “debt traps.”

Related posts:

  1. QuickQuid Collapse – Everything You Need To Know As Payday Lender Leaves UK
  2. Advocates Again Call for Legislation Capping Payday Loan Rates
  3. Four million payday and home loan customers from Provident, Greenwood and Satsuma must request repayments NOW
  4. Consumer Fees Come Into the Crosshairs: CFPB Seeks Public Comment on Alleged ‘Unwanted Fees’ in Consumer Financial Services Industry | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Tagspayday loans

CATEGORIES

  • Fragile States
  • Kalahari desert
  • Namib desert
  • Sahara desert
  • Savanna desert

RECENT POSTS

  • NEW POLL SHOWS SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF HOURLY WORKERS FIGHTING HIGH GASOLINE PRICES AND INFLATION
  • Obituary of Richard Gauthier – Le Soleil du Désert
  • Three tips for investing in a recession
  • Norwich’s Joe Ringer Band flew to the Sahara Desert
  • Amber Heard will become a “full-time mom” in this remote desert town

ARCHIVES

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • November 2012
  • May 2012
  • October 2011
  • November 2010
  • April 2008
  • July 2006
  • November 2005
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions