Sahara Fragile

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States

Sahara Fragile

Header Banner

Sahara Fragile

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States
Sahara desert
Home›Sahara desert›What really turned the Sahara Desert from a green oasis to a desert? | Science

What really turned the Sahara Desert from a green oasis to a desert? | Science

By Christopher J. Jones
March 24, 2017
0
0


One of the world’s most iconic deserts was once lush and green. What happened?
Alamy

When most people imagine an archetypal desert landscape – with its relentless sun, rippling sand, and hidden oases – they often imagine the Sahara. But 11,000 years ago, what we know today as the world’s largest hot desert would have been unrecognizable. The now parched northern strip of Africa was once green and vibrant, dotted with lakes, rivers, meadows and even forests. Where has all this water gone?

Archaeologist David Wright has an idea: Maybe humans and their goats tipped the scales, kicking off this dramatic ecological transformation. In a new study from the journal Frontiers in Earth SciencesWright pledged to argue that humans could be the answer to a question that has plagued archaeologists and paleoecologists for years.

The Sahara has long been subjected to periodic episodes of humidity and aridity. These fluctuations are caused by slight oscillations in the tilt of the Earth’s orbital axis, which in turn change the angle at which solar radiation enters the atmosphere. At repeated intervals throughout Earth’s history, there has been more energy from the sun during the monsoon season in West Africa, and during these periods – known as periods African wetlands – much more rain falls over North Africa.

With more rain, the area gets more greenery, rivers and lakes. All of this has been known for decades. But between 8,000 and 4,500 years ago, something strange happened: the wet-to-dry transition occurred much faster in some areas than could be explained by orbital precession alone, culminating in the Sahara Desert as we know it today. “Scientists generally call this ‘bad parameterization’ of the data,” Wright said in an email. “Which means we have no idea what we’re missing here, but something’s wrong.”

As Wright examined the archaeological and environmental data (mostly sediment cores and pollen records, all dated to the same period), he noticed what appeared to be a pattern. Wherever archaeological records showed the presence of “pastoralists” – humans with their pets – there was a corresponding change in the types and variety of plants. It was as if, every time humans, their goats, and their cattle hopped through the grasslands, they had turned everything into brush and desert in their wake.

Wright thinks that’s exactly what happened. “By overgrazing the grasses, they reduced the amount of moisture in the air – the plants give off moisture, which produces clouds – and improved albedo,” Wright said. He suggests that this may have triggered the end of the wet period more abruptly than the orbital changes can explain. These nomadic humans may also have used fire as a tool for land management, which would have exacerbated the speed at which the desert took hold.

It is important to note that the Green Sahara would always have become a desert again even without humans doing anything. In addition, according to Tierney, we don’t necessarily need humans to explain the abruptness of the transition from green to desert.

Instead, the culprits could be regular feedbacks from old vegetation and changes in the amount of dust. “At first you have this slow change in Earth’s orbit,” Tierney explains. “As this happens, the West African monsoon will weaken a bit. Slowly you will degrade the landscape, moving from desert to vegetation. And then at some point you pass the tipping point where change is accelerating.

Tierney adds that it’s hard to know what triggered the waterfall in the system because everything is so closely linked. During the last wet period, the Sahara was populated by hunter-gatherers. As the orbit slowly changed and less rain fell, humans would have had to domesticate animals, like cattle and goats, for food. “It could be the climate pushing people to keep livestock, or overgrazing practices have accelerated denudation [of foliage]Tierney says.

Which one came first? It’s hard to say with the evidence we have now. “The question is: how to test this hypothesis? she says. “How do we isolate climate change from the role of humans? It’s a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Wright also cautions that at present we only have evidence of correlation, not causation.

But Tierney is also intrigued by Wright’s research and agrees with him that a lot more research is needed to answer these questions.

“We have to dig into the dry lake beds that are scattered across the Sahara and look at the pollen and seed data and then match them to the archaeological data sets,” Wright said. “With enough correlations we may be able to more definitively develop a theory as to why the rate of climate change at the end of AHP does not match orbital timescales and is irregular across North Africa. . “

Tierney suggests that researchers could use mathematical models that compare the impact hunter-gatherers would have on the environment versus that of pastoralists raising animals. For such models it would be necessary to have some idea of ​​how many people were living in the Sahara at the time, but Tierney is sure there were more people in the area than there are today. ‘hui, with the exception of coastal urban areas.

Although the changes between a green Sahara and a desert are a type of climate change, it is important to understand that the mechanism differs from what we now consider anthropogenic (man-made) climate change, which is largely due to increased levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Still, that doesn’t mean these studies can’t help us understand the impact humans have on the environment today.

“It’s really important,” Tierney says. “Understanding how these feedbacks (loops) work could improve our ability to predict changes for vulnerable arid and semi-arid regions. “

Wright sees an even larger message in this type of study. “Humans don’t exist in ecological voids,” he said. “We are a key species and as such we have massive impacts on the entire ecological complexion of the Earth. Some of them may be good for us, but some have really threatened the long term sustainability of the Earth. ”

Climate Change Deserts Earth Sciences Ecology New Research Plants Trees


Related posts:

  1. Sahara desert dust will hit Florida and could cause COVID-19-like symptoms
  2. ‘Star Wars’ fan once searched the Sahara Desert for priceless collectibles
  3. Corkman raises money for charity by trekking 260 km through the Sahara Desert
  4. Pastor RUGA Osinbajo: A Man’s Vision Turns the Dubai Desert into the Singapore of the Middle East By Bayo Oluwasanmi
Tagsclimate changesahara desert

CATEGORIES

  • Fragile States
  • Kalahari desert
  • Namib desert
  • Sahara desert
  • Savanna desert

RECENT POSTS

  • Coupon App Provider Ranking Sees Competitors
  • Ziggurat Theater Ensemble presents a fantastic outdoor performance in the Maine desert
  • this is definitely an open world game
  • The dust of the Sahara desert en route to the Deep South
  • Beware of Claims of Financial Inclusion Amid Cryptocurrency

ARCHIVES

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • November 2012
  • May 2012
  • October 2011
  • November 2010
  • April 2008
  • July 2006
  • November 2005
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions